Written on 9:58:00 PM by S. Potter
I am sure most developers (whether Java, Ruby, Python, or other) have used Subversion, Perforce or CVS to manage and control their projects' source, but have you used
I am sure most of you would have heard of
git - it hosts the Linux kernel code currently. A few less have probably encountered
darcs before on an obscure European open source project you were interested in once or twice. Prior to this evening, the most notable point of
darcs, to me, is that it is written in Haskell - a language I plan on reading more about because I have heard so many good things about it. Both
darcs are examples of distributed version control systems of which there has been an explosion of products (both commercial and open source) since
Tonight I had the fortune of experiencing
darcs for the first time. Previously I had used
darcs get URL to download code before, but never actually utilized any of the features before. Tonight I submitted a patch to a Ruby open source project (RForum) and found the experience very pleasurable as a developer.
I have read that
darcs is a user friendly version of
git minus some powerful options.
Perhaps there are
darcs gurus reading that can shed more light on these two less mainstream SCM systems? If so, I would love to hear your thoughts on them especially if you can compare and contrast with any non-trivial Subversion, Perforce or CVS experiences.
Background: I currently use Subversion, however, I usually work in smaller teams, so concurrent work is not that much of an issue at present, but things will be changing. The largest team I worked in on a Subversion project was 6 active developers (9 for the one Perforce project). Of course, I have worked on a project with over 80 developers, but that was using
ClearCase and there were so many problems with that project that I can't determine what was caused by
ClearCase or the rest of the project's [many] issues.