Rails rocks, X sucks: How Provincial

Written on 2:12:00 PM by S. Potter

I seem to be coming across more and more [Steve] Jobs-clones or simply no-thinking Apple fan boys lately. I don't mind the Apple fans that thought themselves about why they love their stylish new Macbook Pro, I have just had enough of the no-thinking variety of Apple zealots. This part of the Rails community appears to be a large population unfortunately. Because these fan boys are actually incapable of thinking on their own, they adopt other people's arguments and say things like: "Rails rules, X sucks because so-and-so said this...". Hmmmm. Need I say more? On the other side I recently came across a Django fan boy who tried to convince his non-technical manager that Rails "cannot scale period". Hmmmm. How original. A blanket statement like this is not only misleading, it is actually in many ways technically incorrect. This is why in middle school we learned how to qualify our arguments. Why is it that supposed college graduates cannot do this in their 20s and 30s? It is one thing to strip out technical jargon for non-technical managers to understand a situation, but it is quite another to over simplify and mislead them because you have your own tech-religion agenda. Be passionate, but admit to yourself and others when passion is getting the better of you. Why is acknowledging your chosen solution's weakness bad? Doesn't it actually make the solution implementation stronger if you have thought about scenario-based weaknesses? How about we each try to *qualify* our positions on technology solutions out there, rather than figuratively urinate all over others without any basic respect for them. I encourage criticism, but criticize constructively. Say why. On the flip side, we should also accept constructive criticism too. The first step to constructive criticism, need not necessarily be candy coating your critique, but having the right intentions behind your critique. For example, if your motivation for giving criticism is to start a flame war (sorry that is probably a very out of date term now), then you will probably get what you want. However, if you really want to help a project get better because you care, then that is the first step. In addition, the way you word and tone statements (as Twitter's Alex Payne should have learned all too well by now) has a big impact. For example, Alex Payne's statements about Rails and Ruby cost me a contract at a former Rails shop that had a conniving PHP zealot waiting in the wings to jump on anything and take issue with Rails to upper management. Lucky for him, it worked and he had 3 to 4 months of leading a team to miserable failure using Drupal as a "platform". Not necessarily a reflection of PHP (or Drupal for CMS applications since it was far from a CMS application), but a reflection of this calculating pseudo-coder's inability to lead a project. A "technical" manager who thought the kernel version on his Fiesty Ubuntu laptop was 7.0.4. Enough said!:) Overall, I hope we can start to have intelligent conversations about software stacks rather than "yours sucks ass". Because the latter in the end favors nobody. PS Merb rulez and Rails suckz!:) If you want to know why read my teaser entry titled Why Merb is delicious, though I plan on writing more soon. PPS Merb wouldn't be where it is today without Rails.

If you enjoyed this post Subscribe to our feed


  1. Anonymous |

    Ah, Susan, those were the days. So glad to be in Tokyo now.

    And I can't wait until DataMapper 0.9 comes out on the 26th. I'm gonna go to town.

    Hope you're well.

  2. S. Potter |

    Cheek, you can't gloat about your world traveling exploits while I am trapped in your homeland waiting for immigration paperwork to pass. Cheek!!!!:)

    Glad you are enjoying Tokyo (lucky bastard).

  3. jerrett |

    can't wait to play with merb 1.0


Post a Comment